In this post I discuss five common grammar questions (in no particular order) that I see in my editorial work and the wider world.
1. Which terms require apostrophes?
One of the most common grammar questions involves the use of the apostrophe. Writers regularly use contractions like “it’s” and “you’re” interchangeably with their possessive homophones “its” and “your.” “It’s” is a contraction of “it” and “is,” and “you’re” is a contraction of “you” and “are.” “Its” is the possessive form of “it,” and “your” is the possessive form of “you.”
One also sees apostrophes used incorrectly to make words plural, often in family names or other proper nouns. The Wallace family (to choose a random name) might place “The Wallace’s” on its mailbox. Or a restaurant might advertise that it “serves lunch on Sunday’s starting at noon.” For family names and any other proper noun, leave out the apostrophe to make them plural: “The Wallaces,” “Sundays.”
For more, take our quiz on possessives and see our post on forming the plural of family names ending in s.
2. How do I make sure I’m using parallelism correctly?
Writers often have questions about constructing grammatical parallelism, especially with correlative conjunctions—phrases like “not only” and “but also.” The key point to remember is that phrases like “not only” need to appear after the word that governs both items in a parallel construction. What does that mean? I’ll give you an example. “John not only noticed Bob’s new car but also Bob’s new toupee.” Most readers likely grasp the meaning of the sentence, but the placement of “not only” might create some confusion. Because “noticed” governs both items in the construction (John noticed both the car and the hairpiece), “not only” needs to appear after it: “John noticed not only Bob’s new car but also Bob’s new toupee.” Note also that the items in a parallel construction need to be, well, parallel. That’s why you should repeat “Bob’s” before “new toupee.”
See our other posts on parallel structure and correlative conjunctions, and take our quiz on correlative conjunctions.
3. Where should I place modifiers in a sentence?
A common question writers have is not only where to place modifiers but also what counts as a modifier. In the sentence “A renowned author, she has received several awards for her work,” the phrase “a renowned author” modifies “she.” In English grammar, modifiers need to appear directly before what they modify. But consider the following sentence: “A renowned author, her work has received several awards.” The phrase “a renowned author” is an example of a dangling modifier, because it has nothing to modify. It can’t modify “her work” or “several awards.”
Here’s another example: “As an executive, many different problems land on my desk.” It probably seems clear after you’ve read the sentence that the person who refers to “my desk” is the executive. But the phrase “as an executive” is also a dangling modifier, unattached to anything in the rest of the sentence. You might revise as follows: “As an executive, I see many different problems land on my desk.” An exception to this rule is when the modifier modifies the general situation of the sentence, not one particular part, as in this example: “Given the weather conditions, schools and offices closed for the day.” The phrase “given the weather conditions” describes the situation that caused the closing, and so it doesn’t need to modify a specific term or phrase in the sentence.
For more advice, see our post on dangling modifiers and take our quiz.
4. When do I need to use a comma before “because”?
When you write a negative statement such as “He did not learn anything that day,” you often follow it up with the reason. Why did he not learn anything that day? Perhaps because he was asleep in class. But the sentence “He did not learn anything that day because he was asleep in class” is potentially ambiguous. The word not seems to apply to the entire phrase beginning with learn. So the sentence might be saying that the reason he failed to learn is not that he was sleeping in class, but rather some other reason. This ambiguity is why you need to insert a comma before “because” in these kinds of negative statements. “He did not learn anything that day, because he was asleep in class.” Now the sentence successfully conveys the idea that this guy needs to get some rest before coming to class.
Want more help? Read our post on this subject.
5. When should I hyphenate terms?
Writers are often unsure when to insert hyphens between words. I have seen references to “the world-order,” “advanced problem-solving,” and “event-planning.” But these phrases don’t need hyphens. Usually you need hyphens only when a pair of words works together as an adjective. In phrases like “problem-solving strategies” and “event-planning guidelines,” hyphens make sense. Hyphenated words do sometimes become widely accepted if they are used together constantly. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary contains the word “decision-making,” for example. But most of the time you don’t need to hyphenate phrases like that. You can always check the dictionary to make sure. If you don’t see the phrase hyphenated there, it’s probably best to omit the hyphen when you use it.
Have a look at our post on hyphens in MLA style for more.
Conclusion
I hope you found this post helpful and picked up some useful tips. If you’re feeling confident, stick around on the Style Center and take more of our quizzes!
20 Comments
Romana Huk 10 January 2022 AT 11:01 AM
I'm afraid I don't see that 4. above is true, or the example given ambiguous. It's a restrictive phrase, and as the editor of Religion & Literature I would not leave that comma in.
Joseph Wallace 26 January 2022 AT 03:01 PM
Thanks for your comment! I think my example was indeed ambiguous, and I’ll try to clarify. The issue, at least as I see it, is not whether the because phrase is restrictive or nonrestrictive. The issue is whether the phrase is governed by the word “not.” Here’s an example with two because phrases, in which it’s clear that the word “not” governs the first one: “He did not learn anything that day because he was asleep in class, but because he was not paying attention.” There it’s clear that the sentence is rejecting the first because phrase in favor of the second because phrase. The logic behind this principle is that if you write something like “He did not learn anything that day because he was asleep in class,” it might be unclear whether the word “not” applies to the because phrase if you don’t include the comma. That said, I would never argue that this is an ironclad, unbreakable rule. If you don’t hear any ambiguity in a comma-free because phrase, then perhaps it’s likely that your readers won’t either!
Whitney 17 April 2023 AT 12:04 PM
Your example isn’t ambiguous. Here’s my suggestion: “He didn’t learn that day because Mr. Jones was teaching.” This is ambiguous b/c it could go either way—maybe he learned or maybe he didn’t. In your example, it’s clear that he did not learn anything—it couldn’t be taken any other way.
For your expanded example to make sense, it would have to read like this: “He didn’t not learn anything that day because he was asleep in class, but because he was not paying attention.” Or, “He didn’t learn anything that day, not because he was asleep in class but because he was not paying attention.”
Tommy 10 January 2022 AT 01:01 PM
I disagree with your rule about the comma before because. If the because clause came at the beginning of the sentence, then yes a comma would be needed but not if it comes at the end.
Allan Marcil 10 January 2022 AT 06:01 PM
What is the MLA position on non-binary pronoun usage?
Ellen Kersey 10 January 2022 AT 07:01 PM
I don't have a question, but I do have a suggestion. I developed this plan for using apostrophes some years ago while teaching high school sophomores.
The Rules:
1) Write the name of the owner.
2) Add an apostrophe.
3) Add an "s" if you hear it.
Here's how it works:
a) I want to write about several boys who have bikes.
1) the boys
2) the boys'
3) (I'll not add an "s" because I'm not going to say "the boys'(es) bikes"
b) I want to write about the toys the children have:
1) the children
2) the children'
3) the children's toys
I added an "s" because I heard it.
c) I want to have a doormat made for my family. We are the Kerseys.
1) Kerseys
2) Kerseys'
3) Kerseys'
(I'll not add an "s" because I'm not going to say Kerseyses.
d) I want to write about one boy who has a bike.
1) the boy
2) the boy'
3) the boy's
I added an "s" because I heard it.
My students still had trouble with apostrophes to show ownership because of their earlier training -- from other teachers and from textbooks. Forget "if it's singular" and "if it's plural." Just follow the three rules. They always work.
Dr Maheswari 11 January 2022 AT 06:01 AM
Really useful and informative.
Krushna Chandra Mishra 11 January 2022 AT 12:01 PM
It's informative.
Humphrey Tonkin 11 January 2022 AT 05:01 PM
Is "advanced problem solving" the solving of advanced problems or an advanced version of problem-solving? I think you need a hyphen if it's the latter...
Joseph Wallace 26 January 2022 AT 03:01 PM
I’m not sure I see much of a distinction between those two possibilities. If the phrase means an advanced version of problem solving, then the problems involved would also be advanced, I would think. Simple problems wouldn’t require an advanced version of problem solving. So I would argue that both possibilities are captured by the phrase “advanced problem solving.” But if you sense some ambiguity in the phrase, you might opt to reword: “solving advanced problems” or “an advanced kind of problem solving.”
David Wilmsen 11 January 2022 AT 10:01 PM
Punctuation is not grammar.
Darryl Hattenhauer 13 January 2022 AT 08:01 PM
Is this appositive misplaced? "Josephine, the leading hitter, belted a grand slam."
Joseph Wallace 26 January 2022 AT 03:01 PM
That sentence looks good to me!
Carol Gibson 19 January 2022 AT 11:01 AM
I don't agree with no. 4 either. I would never consider that phrase ambiguous. I consider it a subordinate clause, and as such, I would never place a comma in front of because.
Robert Freidin 07 May 2022 AT 12:05 PM
Punctuation and sentence structure are intrinsically connected.
Robert Freidin 07 May 2022 AT 01:05 PM
In reply to David Wilmsen's comment above: punctuation is intrinsically connected to sentence structure (syntax, which is a part of grammar). See §1.2 of my Adventures in English Syntax (Cambridge University Press, 2020) for a demonstration.
mike conboy 10 August 2022 AT 01:08 PM
Sentence:
A brittle hide of fish flies covers everything and he likes the crunching sound his tires make as they roll over them.
Question:
Is "them" correct or does it have to agree with the singular "brittle hide" and be "it?"
Muhammad-Reza Fakhr-Rohani 17 July 2023 AT 06:07 PM
Dear Madam or Sir,
I am an Iranian academic and have been developing a revised version of a certain English translation of an Islamic religious classic. I have encountered many allusions to the Quran in it, hence it is necessary to mark them in my version.
In order to highlight a passage as an allusion, what is the standard abbreviation for the word "allusion" in the sense and context of "allusion to a certain passage, concept, or event"?
Is it appropriate to use "cf." for marking an allusion, provided that it is explained in the beginning of the book?
I will be grateful for your reply at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Dr. Muhammad-Reza Fakhr-Rohani
Dave Donahue 13 November 2023 AT 06:11 PM
Which is correct? If it were me or if it was me.
HydeRaza 18 January 2024 AT 10:01 PM
A short answer without any explanations and examples, to Dave Donahue’s question
“Which is correct? If it were me or if it was me.”
is as follows:
“If it were me”, is the correct usage.
Join the Conversation
We invite you to comment on this post and exchange ideas with other site visitors. Comments are moderated and subject to terms of service.
If you have a question for the MLA's editors, submit it to Ask the MLA!