The verb comprise resembles the verb compose, and writers sometimes confuse the two terms, but they actually mean different things and are used differently.
To comprise means “to include, contain, enclose, or take in” (Cook 172), as in the sentence, A sonnet comprises fourteen lines of verse.
To compose means “to form the substance of” or to “constitute” (“Compose”), as in the sentence, The volume is composed of many essays.
When in doubt about whether to use comprise or compose in a sentence, follow Claire Cook’s advice and substitute the verb include or one of its synonyms (e.g., contain, enclose, or take in): if the substitution fits, then you can use comprise; if it does not fit, then you can try compose (172).
Let’s use this rubric to assess the following sentence.
The crowd was comprised of friends and neighbors.
The verb include, or one of its synonyms, cannot replace comprise in the example sentence, so we know that comprise is the wrong verb. Instead the sentence should use compose or a similar verb:
The crowd was composed of [or made up of] friends and neighbors.
Here’s another example:
An orchestra comprises many different instruments.
The verb include could replace comprise in this sentence (An orchestra includes many different instruments), so we know that comprise is correct.
Works Cited
Cook, Claire Kehrwald. Line by Line: How to Edit Your Own Writing. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1985.
“Compose, Vb. 1b.” Merriam-Webster Unabridged, 2022, unabridged.merriam-webster.com/collegiate/compose.
3 Comments
Ergo Sum 27 July 2023 AT 07:07 AM
Dear Michael,
Thanks for pointing out the difference between these verbs.
Unfortunately, your first example is a bit confusing because you used the verb "comprise" in the passive voice and you added the preposition "of". What about the sentence in the active voice: "The crowd comprised friends and neighbours"?
Frank Dana 04 September 2023 AT 08:09 AM
Your active-voice example would be correct. It's precisely that distinction, that the MLA is illustrating here.
It's become something of an epidemic to describe a thing as "comprised of" other parts, and that's always wrong. Nothing is ever "comprised of" anything. It either "comprises" those things (or "comprised", in the past tense), or it is/was "composed of" them.
Mark 29 March 2024 AT 02:03 PM
When I look at the example, "An orchestra comprises many different instruments", I can replace it with "An orchestra [is made up of] many different instruments", which would then make the word "composed" fit perfectly here. I find I am still utterly confused by the differences between compose and comprise.
Join the Conversation
We invite you to comment on this post and exchange ideas with other site visitors. Comments are moderated and subject to terms of service.
If you have a question for the MLA's editors, submit it to Ask the MLA!