The MLA follows Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary in using multiple to mean “consisting of, including, or involving more than one” or “many, manifold” (“Multiple, Adj.,” defs. 1 and 2 [Collegiate Dictionary]). But in my view multiple is often not a good synonym for many, meaning “a large number,” because multiple has traditionally had a narrower sense: that many elements or parts belong to or are involved in one thing or one event. The definitions of multiple in Merriam-Webster Unabridged (“Multiple, Adj.,” def. 1), The American Heritage Dictionary (“Multiple”), and the Oxford English Dictionary (“Multiple, N. and Adj.,” def. B1a) all convey the idea of connectedness.
A few examples:
A woman who gave birth to five daughters over eight years has many children.
A woman who delivered five daughters in four minutes by caesarean section had a multiple birth.
A man who broke a leg, wrist, and finger in three separate accidents suffered many broken bones.
A man who broke a leg in three places in a single accident suffered a multiple fracture.
A car that was bought and sold six times has had many owners.
When six people together own one car, their ownership is multiple.
If you are writing multiple only because many seems unsophisticated, consider Bryan Garner’s second essential rule of officialese: “[I]f a longer word (e.g., utilize) and a shorter word (e.g., use) are both available, choose the longer”—lest that admonishing finger point to you.
Works Cited
Garner, Bryan A. “Officialese.” Garner’s Modern American Usage, 3rd ed., Oxford UP, 2009, p. 587.
“Multiple.” The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2020, ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=multiple.
“Multiple, Adj.” Merriam-Webster Unabridged, 2020, unabridged.merriam-Webster.com/collegiate/multiple. Collegiate Dictionary.
“Multiple, Adj.” Merriam-Webster Unabridged, 2020, unabridged.merriam-Webster.com/unabridged/multiple.
“Multiple, N. and Adj.” Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford UP, 2020, www.oed.com/view/Entry/123584.
6 Comments
PeterWhite 08 January 2021 AT 02:01 PM
Am I being over-sensitive (or wrong!) in feeling that “multiple “ is purposely used to create imprecision by writers who are not sure whether they mean “a few” “a couple” “some” “a considerable number” “a lot” “a vast number” or some other more precise/informative term?
Steve 18 July 2022 AT 08:07 PM
I agree, but I'd phrase it differently: they are using 'multiple' to mean 'more than one,' precisely as Kandel tries to discourage.
I think you give too much credit to think suggest they're trying to obscure the magnitude of objects.
Sonya Carter 28 October 2022 AT 12:10 PM
I always felt that multiple was meant to convey a number that is larger than two. Since two can be referred to as a couple.
Michelle Miranda 04 November 2022 AT 03:11 PM
I am English and 78, England-educated, - always understood 'multiple' to mean a plurality of disparate items, eg. 'After the severe accident he was treated for multiple injuries.'
The word is selected these days when 'several' or 'many' is really meant, I believe for the speaker to sound more erudite.
Jean Smythe 07 April 2023 AT 11:04 AM
I absolutely agree, having the same background as you and a few more (not multiple) years in age. TV announcers and newspapers these days are all using "multiple" when "many" would seem much better and to my mind easier.
Richard Stoddart 15 April 2024 AT 04:04 PM
I agree. Like “simplistic” for “simple”. We all know what simple means; simplistic usually means too simple; you’ve missed the point. And “critique” is usually not another way to say “criticism” but is a critical analysis or essay. But I guess it looks better…
Join the Conversation
We invite you to comment on this post and exchange ideas with other site visitors. Comments are moderated and subject to terms of service.
If you have a question for the MLA's editors, submit it to Ask the MLA!